• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!



This version was saved 12 years, 6 months ago View current version     Page history
Saved by Sarita
on January 24, 2012 at 5:30:05 pm

KCC Plans Responses to KCC Responses from KCC What You Can Do Action Group Activity From Government  Individual Letters to KCC


Welcome to KentHEPublic


This wiki has been created by Kent home educators to share information, ideas and to collaborate on projects in response to Kent County Councils Proposed Changes to its home education policy.

Our aims are:

  1. to educate and ensure that KCC adheres to the existing legal framework for education otherwise than at home,
  2. to lobby KCC to undertake a full public consultation with all home educators on all home education policy changes.


You will also find advice on writing to councillors and MPs. All actions relating to our response will be posted here and will be available for comment and for your reference if you are writing your own letters. Please feel free to browse and if you would like to join us or send in your own content, please email jslgkt1@yahoo.com, and we will send you an invite to join our action wiki.


Please click here to find out how to use the public wiki.


***Latest News***


View and comment on our Open Letter to Patrick Leeson. If you wish to add your name, please add it in the comment box. We would like this to land in his Inbox on Monday. 


Things are moving pretty fast - so if you have any correspondence that you have received from KCC and wish to share it please do add it if you have a login or email me and I can add it for you.


The page KCC Plans has all the details of what KCC proposals are including the webcast of the meeting where council members discussed Children Educated at Home. 


Kent County Council - Proposed Changes to HE Policy


Plans are afoot by the newly structured Education, Learning and Skills team at KCC to not only review current EHE policy but also proposals have last week been put forward to considerably increase registration and monitoring activity - to the point of creating 3 new posts in order to monitor the progress of all known home educated children in Kent once a year but also to find all unknown HE children. 


The following document appeared on a couple of national HE lists and having read through it we are extremely concerned about what is about to happen here in Kent. 



The person behind this document is Patrick Leeson who is currently Corporate Director of Education, Learning and Skills (ELS) at KCC. Prior to KCC (jul 2011) he was Director of Education and Care at Ofsted, when Ofsted published its report 'Local Authorities and Home Education', calling for a registration and monitoring scheme for all home educated children. The document that he has produced to implement here in Kent is directly lifted from that report. At the time, the report was condemned not only by the home education community nationally but also by Graham Stuart MP (you can view his comments here) and other supporters of the home ed movement. Leesons' career in education has only ever been from the schooled perspective.


Document Summary:

Essentially KCC are trying to extend their legal remits and responsibilities in stating that as part of their self-imposed duty to safeguard all children, they have to register and monitor all home ed children and find all unknown HE children as well. It goes on to state what they are currently doing and then what plans they have to achieve this.


What they are doing currently to achieve these aims:

1. They state that work is already underway to ascertain the extent of unknown home ed children. (They don't say how, but could it be that the recent truancy patrols are a part of this?).

2. Upon deregistration, the LA now requests information from various other agencies (we're assuming without the consent of the parent) in order to prioritise home visits. (I am trying to find out whether they can do this legally as prior to all of this Tim Fox used to have to send a letter requesting whether he could share details with other agencies.).

3. Due to the restructuring at KCC, home education no longer falls under the remit of Admissions and Transport but Advocacy and Entitlement. Within that department, Elective Home Education falls under the heading "Inclusion"!!


Policy changes and proposals:

Three new posts are to be created to ensure that all registered home educated children are visited once per year. These new positions will be responsible for:

- visiting home ed families in order to monitor children's progress (they have no legal duty to do this)

- take action when children educated at home are not receiving a 'satisfactory education' (this is not a legal definition and opens a huge can of worms for us if they decide to apply their own measures of suitability)

- appraise the progress of those identified as 'a cause for concern' (again, the distinct lack of definition as to what is a cause for concern is worrying as it could be highly subjective)

- ascertaining if there are any 'unregistered' home educated children (not only is this beyond their remit but using the terms 'registered and unregistered' have connotations of licensing and permission granting, which they have no right to do)

- establishing reasons for home education (the current government guidelines state that LAs should not be concerned by this, although I can see that they should know in order to improve their own services, however I feel they may use the information to intimidate and bully parents to place their children back into school or preventing withdrawal)

- gathering information about ethnicity and language

- acting on Ofsted's recommendations, namely, to explore reasons for withdrawal from school prior to deregistration with a view to keeping the child at school, ensuring that Connexions are put into contact with all HE children aged 14+, to create an information service for parents, training for LA officers on safeguarding and home visits. 


The document concludes by stating that all known HE children will be visited this year. 


Why we should be concerned:

 1. Firstly, there is no guarantee what the new post holders will be like, what their background is and how they feel about HE, regardless of any 'training' they might receive. It is clear what their job description is - registration and monitoring. Given that they are being given a license by the LA to act outside the law, one can only imagine the type of people they might recruit to do this!


2. This is a charter to set up a registration scheme, whereupon, the LA will be able to exhaust all their resources trying to keep children at school, when it might not be the best place for them. In exploring the reasons, it is possible that they may make it harder for parents to withdraw their children, imposing conditions and in effect a kind of permission-seeking process in order for parents to home educate. Also in using the terminology, they are seeking to use the deregistration process, not as a notification to cease funding a school place, but in order to keep an HE register.


3. They are acting way beyond their legal remit and surprising after the uproar over the Badman recommendations and the failed legislation. The Ofsted report did come out after all that but it was still condemned by Graham Stuart MP - Chairman of the Education Select Committee (click here to see his response). 


4. The document is so full of inaccuracies and misquotes in terms of their own duties and capacities, that it is clear there is little understanding of the law within KCC, or indeed how home ed works, which makes for extremely bad policy-making (Graham Badman, anyone?). 


5. This is an arrogant attempt to implement a policy that has failed on a national level. There is no mention of working positively with home educating parents so that we may feel compelled to forge a good relationship with the LA, no mention of ways they can enhance our children's education. It is disgusting that they can justify the spending on duties that they do not have when they could arrange (cost-free) for our children to be able to access exam centres, get discounts from Kent County Suppliers, keep a database of recommended resources such as tutors, courses, workshops etc.. Or they could be ploughing back the money into their failing schools!!!


Next Steps:

There is some work to be done in order to stop this nonsense, educate the ELS team on how the law works with regard to EHE and also an opportunity to approach them and work on a policy with them - to state what kind of a relationship we would like to foster with them so that we can all live harmoniously, with those who want support from the LA getting it and those who don't want anything to do with them, being left alone. The one duty they do have is to consult with all stakeholders when they draft new policy. This they have not done!


We need to approach them soon, as a single group, as their work is already under way, and we want to affect the draft process positively right from the start. To get involved, carry on reading, sign up to this wiki and start writing letters. Join us if you wish to collaborate on any group responses we send to KCC.

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.